Camelford Association of Residents
Minutes of the meeting held on
at
B
Ellison pointed out that there had been a discrepancy in the minutes in what he
had said or conveyed about the sequence of events leading to the town council’s
purchase of Churchfield Car Park. To set the record straight he wished to
underline that the sequence was as follows.
At
an “in committee meeting” (Cllr. Ellison not present) on
Cllr
Ellison said at the meeting that he felt it should not be discussed “in
committee” and that he felt that no decision should be made until the cost
implications were known to Camelford ratepayers. He also said that a business plan should be
produced and the ratepayers consulted……
No other councillor supported this proposal so it failed to be voted on.
At the meeting he said that he felt that no councillor had a mandate to make
such a big decision on behalf of the ratepayer with out a referendum. Again he failed to gain support for this
view.
Forum
funds received - £1500 from NCDC, £500 from Town Council
Pre-school
re-naming ceremony 29 May – ‘Little Acorns’
Forum
magazine – distribution to be divided up
Highfield
flats – internal painting to be carried out
Parish meeting 24 April at
Town
Council AGM 18 May, Council Chambers,
B
Ellison asked if CAR would be interested in investigating the land behind the
pet shop, Walkies, from the run off from
M
Price (NCDC) will be at the June meeting to discuss affordable housing.
Spring Fayre – possibility
of doing another one in August, also next spring.
J
Finch, when asked, said that she had no idea what money had been taken - it was done
for charities to fund raise.
Option
1 – 91 forms, 105 votes
Option
2 – 38 forms, 52 votes
Option
3 – 31 forms, 38 votes
Option
4 – 13 forms, 14 votes
Option
5 – 99 (+25 A1) = 128 forms, 128 (+31) = 159 votes
5
spoiled papers
Option
2 was put forward (pay and display plus permits, £75 pa, £20 per quarter for
residents, £150 and £50 respectively for businesses)
J
Pearce raised a number of issues that the information was misleading.
At
the Town Council meeting on 21 March it was deferred to give councillors time
to consider the recommendation, and put onto the agenda for 6 April.
On
6 April at the Town Council meeting option 2 accepted subject to the cost of
the Parking Places Order being known before adoption.
All
requests to have a look at the returned forms were refused. The forms given in at A1 Fruiterers were
counted.
Email
correspondence between M Baber and the clerk, in
which he said that he had seen the minutes of 16 March on the website and
thanked her for changing them. B Ireland
said they had never been altered. B
Ellison suggested that a way forward would be that as J Finch was here she was
capable of discussing the issue with the clerk privately and ask him what is it about. J Finch
said she was here as a resident, not as Mayor.
B Ireland said that you are always a councillor or a mayor. It was agreed that we would write to J Finch
and ask for a reply as to the result of her investigation.
B
Ellison said that whilst he found CAR minutes interesting, he had experience of
minutes as a town councillor, district councillor and county councillor and the
two higher authorities minute very little of what was said. It sometimes confuses the issue when you
minute all of what is said and there is a danger of inhibiting people from
speaking. J Hough said that bullet
points are open to interpretation. The
way it is done currently, at least there is a record of what is said and what
is intended. M Baber
said that we are having a lot of people coming on to the website looking at
minutes. Without the detail things could
be taken out of context. If someone
wants to say something delicate we should be able to cope with that. B Lush said that in a meeting like this it
gives the feel of the meeting if you do what you are doing. M Baber said that
we do not make a lot of decisions, but sit and discuss things which need minuting and we will always happily amend minutes if
something is wrong. B Ellison said that
he seemed to be in a minority of one. H
Huntley said that the town council is not giving us draft minutes and it means
that our information is always behind.
Spring
Fayre – a good time was had by all – thanks to the
town council.
At
the last town council meeting there was a discussion on the pond being cleaned
in August and we should offer our help.
We will write to the town council.
Chamber
of Commerce met Dan Rogerson on the 5 April about the
downturn in trade and its possible link with the Churchfield
Car Park. He will get back to the
Chamber of Commerce.
Camelford
water – is in the news again. B Oliver
said this always happens as the tourist season starts. There followed much discussion on the water
pollution and the report which is due to come out. People are working to find out the
truth. All people want is to be
monitored.
D
Pengelly said that the telephone box in
H
Huntley said that the new bus timetable – the bus from Camelford to
H
Huntley said that the Parish Meeting on Monday has been given no
publicity. He has never seen an
advertisement for a Parish Meeting in all his time in Camelford. Start time is